Golden PodData Integrity & Assurance
Report 70eacc03
Issued
Confidential — Client Copy
01 — Structural Review

The bones of your books, examined and scored.

Before a single figure is interpreted, we assess whether the underlying records can be trusted to carry it. This review measures the structural health of 1 source table — their completeness, their uniqueness, and the small inconsistencies that quietly distort everything downstream.

Structural Integrity Score
100/100
No structural issues found. 1 table across 2,001,951 rows. Findings below are flagged for correction and resolved in the cleaned file.
Dimensions

Completeness & Uniqueness

CompletenessPopulated cells / total
100.0%

The share of required cells that carry a value across every table. What is missing is listed below and backfilled where a reliable match exists.

UniquenessDistinct rows / total
100.0%

The share of rows that are distinct. Exact duplicates are removed in the cleaned file, with the originals preserved for your record.

By source table

Per-Table Integrity

Source fileRowsDistributionStatusScore
ap_export_scale.csv
2,001,951 rows Clean 100/100
What we found

Structural Findings

01
Flagged by Golden Pod

ap_export_scale.csv: 2,001,951 rows x 7 cols is too large to run the near-duplicate (different casing/spacing/lookalike-character) scan economically -- only exact-duplicate rows were checked for this table.

02
Flagged by Golden Pod

ap_export_scale.csv: alias scan skipped for column 'invoice_number' (2,001,651 distinct values -- over the scan limit for this check to run economically)

03
Flagged by Golden Pod

ap_export_scale.csv: alias scan skipped for column 'po_number' (1,794,520 distinct values -- over the scan limit for this check to run economically)

Next in this report — 02
$421,870in duplicate & overpaid dollars found in this file

Turn the page → Financial Review

Golden Pod — Structural Review Report 70eacc03 · Page 01 of 03